What implies that government entities do not enforce regulations involving property?

Restrictive covenants are legally binding agreements or clauses that pertain to the use of property within a specific development or neighborhood. These covenants are typically established by a developer or a homeowners' association and are designed to maintain a certain standard or aesthetic in the community. They imply that while government entities may not directly regulate property use, the terms set forth within these covenants are enforced by private entities, such as the homeowners’ association, rather than public governmental regulations. This framework signifies that residents are bound by these agreements, and enforcement comes from community members rather than government entities.

In contrast, community initiatives, informal agreements, and neighborhood watch programs typically involve members of the community working together for shared goals but do not serve the same role in legally binding property regulations as restrictive covenants. These options emphasize voluntary action and cooperation among residents, lacking the enforceable nature of covenants backed by private agreements.